Does writing have the power to enact social change?
Writing is the most powerful form of communication. Everything we perform or speak about has come from a piece of writing. It is a very powerful thing. People everyday writes about their opinions and their beliefs. Some pieces of writing are so amazing that they have the power to change the way people think and feel about a certain issue. Writing also has the power to influence different people into just about anything. There are so many writers today that have influenced the lives of many that if it weren’t for them, no change would have been done. It is important while reading a piece of writing to think about the influence and change it has put on the people reading.
One very important writer we know of today that changed an entire society was Martin Luther King Jr. His writing’s are still being talked about and read today and will continue for years to come. They were so powerful that this one man’s writing was able to change the issue of segregation for the United States. His writing influenced people to think about his aspects and follow him. His writing even started and entire Civil Rights Movement. One man and one man alone became a leader for millions during his life.
Another writer that was able to change society was Adolf Hitler. Although his writings were not in a positive way he was able to have millions of followers in Germany. His speeches were so powerful and persuasive he was able to turn many countries into his idea of a society. Stop and think about this. In the beginning all Hitler did was talk. He made speeches that he shared with millions of people. From this, he was able to brainwash and kill millions of people for many years before any action was taken. So before you say writing is just words on a piece of paper, remember that one mans writing turned almost an entire continent to his ruling. At first Hitler used nothing but his voice to persuade people of his perfect society. From this he gains millions of followers and supporters.
The poet June Jordan is another person who has very persuasive writings. Her one poem called the Bombing of Baghdad is talking about how she believes this war is something that can’t be won. After reading it her writing left an impact on me. She made me think of the situation in her eyes. From her writing I realized that we are merely doing what Baghdad did to the U.S. this means that this strategy is not going to change the situation. Fighting fire with fire only gets you burned. “a city of 5.5 million human beings we bombed radio towers we bombed telephone poles we bombed mosques we bombed runways we bombed tanks we bombed trucks we bombed cars we bombed bridges we bombed the darkness we bombed the sunlight we bombed them.” Isn’t this what the terrorists did to us? Did they not bomb building killing thousands of innocent people? How could anything be accomplished of we are acting as the terrorists did. This is what she is trying to tell her readers. That bombing in return for an attack will not fix the problem.
In conclusion, it is impossible to say that writing does not have an influence on the way people think. It has been proven that with persuasive writing you can make anyone believe your ideas. Even if the piece of writing has an impact on one person, the writer still made an impact and influence. If it wasn’t for these writers and speakers our world may be a very different place.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Crisitna .. this is very well writen . You gave many examples to support your opening pharagrapgh which really stressed your point and got it acorss. One thing I noticed was the improvement in your wrting as you progressed in the paper. I thoguht that the way you worded things and the way you asked questions towards the middle and end was better then the beginning .Also, make sure you profread . There were some little silly mistakes in there. Lastly , I loved the pharagrpah about Hitler. You made me think of things in a differnt way. Great Job :)
ReplyDeleteMany important ideas were brought out to light in your essay. Yet, there could have been more exemplification for your ideas, so the reader could have a better understanding of your writing. Nonetheless, the evidence for your claims, by way of using world history, was a clever way to use examples. Most important check for your gramatical mistakes (subject- verb agreement, syntax etc.) All in all, you did an excellent job, and I found your views very interesting!
ReplyDeleteChristina, I agree with Gabrielle's observation about how your writing changed over the course of this post. It seemed to me as though your perspectives on this topic and your interpretive voice really started to come together in a powerful way once you moved into your discussion of Jordan's poem.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if you felt this change as your were writing. I have the notion that engaging in the practice of writing has a profound affect on the writing itself.